The tech industry is witnessing a potential reunion that seemed impossible just a few years ago. Apple and Intel are reportedly negotiating a deal that flips their historical dynamic on its head.
Intel previously lost its spot inside the Mac. Now the American chip giant is fighting to get back into Apple devices. But this time Intel will not design the brains of the operation. They will simply build them.
Reports indicate that Intel could manufacture A-series chips for the iPhone as early as 2028. This move signals a massive pivot in global electronics supply chains. It also marks a critical win for US manufacturing efforts.
A Slow Start Before the Big Leap
This partnership will not happen overnight. Reliable supply chain analyst Jeff Pu suggests a cautious timeline. The companies plan to start small to ensure quality standards are met.
Projected Timeline of Events:
- 2026: Finalization of trial production agreements and initial testing.
- Mid-2027: Intel manufactures low-end M-series chips for entry-level iPads or Macs.
- Late 2027: Evaluation of yield rates and power efficiency on the 18A process.
- 2028: Volume production begins for A-series chips (likely A22) on the 14A process.
The strategy follows a clear logical path. Apple is famously demanding regarding quality control. They will likely use lower volume devices like the base model iPad to test Intel.
This trial run will utilize Intel’s 18A process node. This technology is crucial for Intel’s turnaround strategy. It aims to rival the efficiency currently offered by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company.
If the 2027 trials succeed then the real work begins. Apple could move production of the A22 chip to Intel factories by 2028. This processor would likely power the standard iPhone 20 or similar non-Pro models.
![]()
Technology Behind the 14A Process
The terminology here can get confusing for the average consumer. The term “14A” refers to Intel’s 1.4-nanometer fabrication technology. This is incredibly small and complex.
To understand the scale consider the following comparison. A strand of human DNA is about 2.5 nanometers wide. Intel plans to build transistors smaller than that.
Comparison of Leading Chip Nodes:
| Feature | TSMC N2 (2nm) | Intel 18A (1.8nm) | Intel 14A (1.4nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Use | High-end 2025/26 Phones | Desktop / Server | Future Mobile / AI |
| Transistor Type | Gate-All-Around (GAA) | RibbonFET | Advanced RibbonFET |
| Power Delivery | Backside (Planned) | PowerVia (Backside) | PowerVia (Refined) |
| Launch Window | Late 2025 | 2025 | 2027-2028 |
Intel claims their 14A node will be the most advanced in the world. It relies on High-NA EUV lithography machines. These massive tools allow engineers to print finer patterns on silicon wafers.
Success here is vital for the deal. Apple silicon is known for industry leading power efficiency. Intel must prove their 14A chips do not overheat or drain batteries.
“If Intel can match TSMC on yield and performance, they don’t just win Apple. They win the trust of the entire semiconductor industry.”
The “foundry” model is the key difference this time. Apple designs the blueprints. Intel simply owns the factory that prints them. This is the exact relationship Apple currently holds with TSMC.
Why Apple Needs a New Partner
You might wonder why Apple would change a winning formula. TSMC has been a flawless partner for over a decade. They have helped Apple dominate the mobile performance charts.
The answer lies in risk management. Apple currently relies almost exclusively on Taiwan for its processor supply. This creates a single point of failure.
Major Risks of Single-Source Manufacturing:
- Geopolitical tensions in the Taiwan Strait.
- Natural disasters like earthquakes disrupting production lines.
- Capacity bottlenecks when demand spikes globally.
- Lack of price leverage during contract negotiations.
Diversification is the primary goal for Tim Cook and his operations team. They learned hard lessons during the pandemic supply chain crisis. They cannot afford to have no iPhone chips if one region shuts down.
Moving production to Intel also aligns with American interests. The US government passed the CHIPS Act to bring manufacturing home. Apple faces political pressure to support domestic industry.
Intel has promised to build massive factories in Ohio and Arizona. These sites would likely handle the Apple orders. This allows Apple to stamp “Made in USA” on more components.
What This Means for the Industry
This deal is a lifeline for Intel. The company has struggled to compete with nimble rivals like Nvidia and AMD. Their stock price and reputation have taken hits in recent years.
Securing Apple as a flagship customer changes the narrative. It validates Intel’s foundry business instantly. It proves their factories are capable of handling the most advanced designs in the world.
Other companies will watch this closely. If Apple trusts Intel then Qualcomm or Amazon might follow suit. This could create a true competitor to TSMC’s dominance.
Consumers may not notice a difference in their devices. An iPhone made with an Intel chip should perform exactly like one made with a TSMC chip. Uniformity is the ultimate goal.
However getting there requires overcoming massive hurdles. Intel has a history of delays. They have promised new nodes before and failed to deliver on time.
Apple will maintain strict oversight. They will likely keep TSMC as the primary supplier for “Pro” models. Intel will serve as a secondary source to start.
This competition is good for technology. It drives innovation and lowers costs. It pushes the boundaries of physics to make our phones faster and more efficient.
The road to 2028 is long. Engineers on both sides have years of work ahead. But the foundation for a historic American tech alliance is now being laid.