Connect with us

News

Meta’s AI Support Bot Handed Hackers Instagram Accounts

Meta’s AI Support Assistant gave attackers access to high-profile Instagram accounts in June 2026 by processing email changes without identity verification. Here’s what happened.

Published

on

Attackers seized high-profile Instagram accounts this week without touching a single password, deploying malware, or sending a phishing link. They opened Meta’s AI Support Assistant, claimed to be the account owner, and the bot sent a one-time verification code to whatever email they specified. From there, a password reset took minutes.

The flaw traces to Meta’s March 2026 decision to expand the AI Support Assistant across Facebook and Instagram with authority to complete account recovery end to end, including password resets and email address changes. No identity verification checkpoint stood between the assistant and those account settings.

How the Chatbot Handed Over the Keys

The attack process, confirmed by TechCrunch after a reporter reviewed a video of the exploit, required no technical sophistication. 404 Media, which first broke the story, described its core lesson as “the extreme risk of offloading technical support to AI.”

Here is the documented sequence:

  1. The attacker enabled a VPN with an endpoint near the target’s presumed location, bypassing Instagram’s geolocation triggers.
  2. The attacker opened Meta’s AI Support Assistant, triggered the “forgot password” flow, and told the bot the account had been hacked.
  3. When the system requested facial verification, the attacker scraped photos from the target’s public profile, ran them through an AI video generator to create an animated facial clip, and submitted the result. Meta’s verification system accepted it.
  4. The bot sent an eight-digit code to the attacker’s specified email address, with no confirmation that the requester owned the original account.
  5. The attacker entered the code. The bot processed the email change.
  6. With the attacker’s email now linked to the account, a standard password reset locked the original owner out.

TechCrunch verified the attacker’s inbox received the code in real time. Screenshots shared in Telegram channels alongside step-by-step instruction sheets showed the attacker’s request needed fewer than 20 words: name the target account, specify a new email address, ask the bot to link them. A human support agent would have asked the requester to prove ownership before making any account email change; the AI processed the request as given.

The Accounts That Got Taken

The @obamawhitehouse handle, dormant since January 20, 2017, with roughly 2.4 million followers, was seized and briefly used to post an image captioned “The White House is under Shiites’ control.” Chief Master Sergeant John Bentivegna of the U.S. Space Force had his account defaced with pro-Iranian content. The beauty retailer Sephora’s official profile was also taken.

Jane Manchun Wong, an app researcher and former Meta employee known for reverse-engineering unreleased features, found her secondary four-letter handle compromised overnight. “The password got changed without my knowledge,” she wrote on X. “Quite concerning.” Two-factor authentication (2FA) had been active on the account.

The handles @hey and @jowo carried a combined gray-market valuation estimated above $1 million, documented by crypto-crime researcher ZachXBT and the threat-tracking account Dark Web Informer. Stolen usernames appeared on Telegram-based broker channels within minutes of each compromise. SecurityWeek reported hundreds of high-profile accounts were compromised and sold on the dark web before Meta intervened. The gray market for short social handles has operated for years; broker channels had infrastructure in place to move inventory the moment accounts became available.

Meta’s March Decision

In March 2026, Meta expanded its AI Support Assistant across all Facebook and Instagram accounts and gave the chatbot authority to act on account recovery requests end to end. The company’s account recovery support page describes the capability as “Account security and recovery” and promises “Solutions, not just suggestions.” The assistant could add email addresses, trigger password resets, and update profile settings without a mandatory human review at any step.

Instagram’s human support infrastructure had long frustrated users. Recovering a hijacked account through Meta’s ticketing system typically took days; for high-value handles, the back-and-forth stretched into weeks. The AI assistant was built to cut that friction.

Meta had cut more than 8,000 employees and reassigned roughly 7,000 others to AI-focused initiatives, per reporting by the New York Times. The layoffs hit Meta’s integrity division and cybersecurity teams specifically, according to one security analysis published in the days after the exploit went public. Unconfirmed reports have suggested Instagram’s Trust and Safety team was reduced by around 60 percent, though Meta has not confirmed that figure.

404 Media first reported the method publicly, with early coverage cataloguing accounts taken before Meta acknowledged the scope of the problem. The publication noted the feature had been available for months before exploitation instructions began circulating on Telegram on June 1, leaving unanswered how many accounts had been taken quietly before that date.

A Fix That May Not Be One

On Monday, Andy Stone, Meta’s Vice President of Communications, posted in replies to affected users that the incident was resolved. By Tuesday, users on the same channels that had spread the original instructions were reporting fresh takeovers.

We’re at the point where one AI stole it, and another can’t fix it, with no humans involved.

That came from the owner of the @korn handle, who spent six hours trying to reach Meta support and received four broken links from the AI system in return. André, another user whose account was seized, described the same loop: “You’re talking to a chatbot that has no ability to help. You can’t escalate to a human. You’re just stuck.”

Several users in the Bugify Vault Telegram channel claimed Meta’s remedy amounted to removing the front-end “Get Support” button from the AI support interface. The underlying API endpoints, they reported, remained accessible through direct requests, scripts, and automated bots. Android Authority reported accounts continuing to be hijacked after Stone’s announcement.

Esther Crawford, Meta’s Director of Product Management, posted that her five-letter handle had been taken after Stone said the issue was resolved. In a follow-up, Stone told users they might receive password reset prompts or security questions on login, suggesting the company had restricted some recovery workflows. What specific backend changes were made, Meta did not confirm.

The Design Flaw Under the Incident

Security researchers identified the root cause as a variant of what computer science calls the “confused deputy” problem, a class of privilege escalation documented since a 1988 paper by software engineer Norm Hardy. The AI assistant held privileged write access to account management APIs that regular users could not invoke directly. An attacker with no credentials submitted a plain-text chat request, and the assistant, acting as a deputy with elevated permissions, executed the API call without any authentication checkpoint. What made this structurally worse than a traditional confused deputy scenario, as cybersecurity researchers noted, is that the “deputy” here was a probabilistic language model: redirect it with words alone, no code exploit required.

Human Support Agent Meta AI Support Assistant
Identity check before email change Required Not applied
Escalation path for disputed requests Available Absent
Time to process a request Hours to days Minutes
Susceptible to social engineering Yes Yes

The Open Worldwide Application Security Project’s Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications lists Excessive Agency as a primary risk category: AI systems granted irreversible write permissions over sensitive user data without a mandatory human confirmation step in the loop. The OWASP framework has flagged the category since the list’s launch in 2023, specifically warning against giving LLMs the ability to trigger irreversible actions without human oversight.

Ian Goldin, a threat researcher at Lumen’s Black Lotus Labs, told Krebs on Security the industry is entering uncharted territory as major platforms expand AI system authority over account operations. “Just like human customer support employees can be social engineered into providing unauthorized access to someone’s account,” Goldin said, “AI bots are equally eager to help and vulnerable to persuasion and trickery.”

Steps That Reduce Your Risk Now

The attack exploited Meta’s infrastructure rather than anything on a user’s device, which limits what individual users can do to prevent it entirely. These steps reduce exposure.

  • Enable two-factor authentication on Instagram and Facebook via account Security settings. Instagram’s account security help pages walk through the setup. The primary attack path documented by TechCrunch was unlikely to succeed against accounts with any form of multi-factor authentication (MFA) active, per Krebs on Security, though variants using AI-generated facial verification videos bypassed 2FA in some reported cases.
  • Limit the number of publicly visible photos that clearly show your face. The secondary attack path relied on scraping public profile images to create facial verification videos.
  • Keep your recovery email address and phone number current and secured with a strong, unique password separate from your social media login.
  • Save proof of account ownership: your original signup email and approximate account creation date are what Meta’s manual review process requests when a dispute reaches a human reviewer.
  • Act immediately on any password reset notification or security code you did not request. An unsolicited code means an active attempt is in progress.

Meta’s public follow-up told users to expect possible password reset prompts and security questions on login. The company did not specify what changes had been made to the underlying recovery workflows.

As of publication, users on the channels that spread the original exploitation instructions were reporting continued access to Instagram accounts.

As the founder of Thunder Tiger Europe Media, Dr. Elias Thornwood brings over 25 years of experience in international journalism, having reported from conflict zones in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa for outlets like BBC World and Reuters. With a PhD in International Relations from Oxford University, his expertise lies in geopolitical analysis and global diplomacy. Elias has authored two bestselling books on European foreign policy and received the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting in 2015, establishing his authoritativeness in the field. Committed to trustworthiness, he enforces rigorous fact-checking protocols at Thunder Tiger, ensuring unbiased, evidence-based coverage of worldwide news to empower informed global audiences.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Finance

Citigroup Says ETF Outflows Drove Bitcoin’s Crash, Not Strategy’s Sale

Citi analysts say $3.77B in spot Bitcoin ETF outflows since mid-May drove BTC’s crash, with fund flows accounting for 45% of Bitcoin’s weekly price moves.

Published

on

Bitcoin broke below $67,000 this week as spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) logged their longest consecutive redemption streak since the products launched in January 2024. Net withdrawals from US spot Bitcoin ETFs totaled $3.77 billion between May 15 and June 2, per Farside Investors’ Bitcoin ETF flow tracker, and Citigroup’s analysts say that sustained institutional exit drove Bitcoin’s decline far more than Strategy’s 32-coin disposal, which captured social-media attention but amounted to less than $3 million in an asset the company still holds at a $63.87 billion cost basis.

Strategy’s 32 BTC That Moved Markets

A Filing That Broke the Pattern

The SEC disclosure arrived June 1. Strategy’s 8-K filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) confirmed the Virginia-based corporate Bitcoin treasury sold 32 coins between May 26 and May 31 at an average price of $77,135 per coin, raising $2.5 million toward funding distributions on the company’s preferred stock. The last time the firm sold any Bitcoin was December 2022, a 704-coin tax-loss harvest reversed within 48 hours when the company repurchased 810 coins at a marginally higher price.

The firm holds 843,706 BTC as of May 31, acquired at a total cost of $63.87 billion. The 32 coins represent roughly 0.004% of that position. Onchain data from Arkham Intelligence had shown the company moving 411.6 BTC from Coinbase Prime to a cold wallet on May 28, pushing prediction-market odds of a near-term sale to 84% before the filing confirmed it. MSTR shares fell roughly 5% to around $151 in the session after the disclosure, and Bitcoin slid toward the $71,400 range.

The Preferred-Stock Connection

Citi characterized the disposal as consistent with a tax-optimization plan disclosed earlier in the year, not a strategic reversal. CEO Phong Le had flagged the new approach on Strategy’s Q1 2026 earnings call. “On our first quarter 2026 earnings call, we said we would proactively manage our convertible debt and use the full range of capital management tools available to us, including the disciplined sale of bitcoin,” Le said in the accompanying press release. The firm’s capital structure spans multiple preferred-stock series, each carrying fixed dividend obligations, and the $2.5 million in sale proceeds flows directly toward those distributions.

  • 32 BTC sold May 26 to May 31 at an average of $77,135 per coin
  • 843,706 BTC remaining in the treasury as of May 31, acquired at a total purchase price of $63.87 billion
  • 0.004% of total holdings liquidated, raising $2.5 million for preferred-stock dividends
  • December 2022 the previous time any BTC was sold, in a tax-loss trade reversed within two days

How ETF Flows Became Bitcoin’s Pulse

Citi’s note, circulated June 3, frames Bitcoin’s demand problem in structural terms. The bank estimates that spot Bitcoin ETF flows explain roughly 45% of BTC’s weekly price variation, making institutional fund allocation decisions the most statistically reliable predictor of near-term Bitcoin price direction. When the wrappers bleed outflows, BTC price follows.

The ETFs, which US regulators approved in January 2024, converted Bitcoin from a self-custody asset into something pension funds, family offices and standard brokerage accounts could hold through familiar investment infrastructure. That shift moved the marginal price-setter from on-chain wallet activity and exchange order books to institutional ETF desk decisions. A single session of heavy withdrawals from products like BlackRock’s IBIT or Fidelity’s FBTC now shows up in BTC spot prices within hours.

An announcement of small digital asset treasury selling has had an outsized effect on BTC in our view but does not alter the fundamental backdrop.

The analysts went further in the June 3 note, warning that “we expect sentiment to remain lackluster, especially as the divergence with equity performance remains stark, absent positive news on the regulatory front or ‘de-basement trade’ fears around fiscal positions.” De-basement demand, as Citi uses the phrase, describes the investment thesis that Bitcoin holds value against government fiscal deterioration and currency erosion. Activating it requires specific macroeconomic conditions, independently of ETF flow direction.

The ETF withdrawals fueling the broader crypto liquidation cascade since mid-May have compounded other pressures: geopolitical risk from US-Iran military escalation, cascading long liquidations that briefly dragged Bitcoin to an intraday low of $65,372, and elevated US inflation keeping Federal Reserve rate-cut expectations subdued.

Bitcoin ETFs Set a Redemption Record

Eleven consecutive sessions of net outflows between May 15 and June 2, totaling $3.77 billion combined, set a record for the longest such streak in US spot Bitcoin ETF history. The five largest single-session withdrawals drove the bulk of the cumulative figure.

Date Net Outflow
May 27 $733.4 million
June 2 $519.1 million
June 1 $483.8 million
May 18 $448.6 million
May 26 $333.6 million

The monthly picture pushed the damage further. Bitcoin spot ETFs closed May with $2.30 billion in net outflows, the largest monthly withdrawal of 2026 and the steepest since November 2025. April had added $1.97 billion in net inflows; March had added $1.32 billion. May’s exit ran roughly ten times the size of February’s $206 million in net redemptions, yet Bitcoin’s price fell only 3.69% during the month, suggesting institutions reduced exposure at a pace well ahead of price weakness alone.

Cumulative net inflows into all US spot Bitcoin ETFs slipped to approximately $55.79 billion from $58.09 billion in April, reversing nearly the entire first-quarter gain in a single month. BlackRock’s IBIT reportedly recorded one of its largest single-session outflows of its operating history in late May. With ETF desks net selling, the standing bid that had helped absorb organic selling from miners and long-term holders thinned out sharply.

Bitcoin’s Widening Gap From the Equity Rally

Bitcoin’s all-time high of approximately $126,200, reached in October 2025, now sits more than 46% above Thursday’s price. US equity indices held comparatively firm over the same stretch, supported by continuing enthusiasm for artificial intelligence and semiconductor stocks.

For institutional allocators managing combined books across equities and digital assets, that performance gap creates mechanical rebalancing pressure. A BTC position that has lost nearly half its peak value while equities hold steady falls below its target portfolio weighting. Managers facing liquidity needs or AI-stock purchase opportunities reach for the underperforming asset as a funding source, compounding the sell pressure.

K33, the Oslo-based crypto research firm, flagged the dynamic in a note published June 3. K33’s head of research, Vetle Lunde, argued that the market views the opportunity cost of holding BTC as too high against AI-related stocks currently posting gains. The firm, which had called $60,000 the cycle low, revised that assessment to warn of “possible deeper lows.” The capital rotation from Bitcoin toward AI stocks and anticipated tech IPO listings accelerated through the same weeks as the ETF redemption streak.

SBI Holdings Chairman and CEO Yoshitaka Kitao, one of Japan’s most prominent financial executives and a strategic Ripple investor, attributed part of the institutional withdrawal to capital preparation for three anticipated US listings: SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, whose combined target valuations approach $3.6 trillion. “Although the cryptocurrency market is declining overall, the reason is believed to be that institutional investors and others are raising funds for acquiring shares in the three major upcoming IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI,” Kitao wrote in a June 3 post on X.

A 50-50 Bet on Regulatory Relief

The Bill That Could Change the Picture

Citi named positive regulatory developments as the one concrete catalyst that could reverse the demand picture. The bank pointed specifically to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), the comprehensive US crypto market structure bill that cleared the Senate Banking Committee in a 15-9 bipartisan vote on May 14 and was subsequently added to the US Senate Legislative Calendar as Calendar No. 423. Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland joined all Republicans on the panel, advancing the legislation after a four-month committee delay.

The CLARITY Act would divide regulatory jurisdiction over digital assets between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the SEC based on whether a given asset functions as a digital commodity or an investment contract. Kitao said he is “convinced that if the Clarity Act is enacted in the United States, it will bring a positive impact to the cryptocurrency market, including Ripple.” The bank put passage odds for 2026 at roughly 50%, with those odds described as declining.

An Increasingly Crowded Calendar

Getting to 60 affirmative votes on the full Senate floor requires a significant bloc of Democratic support beyond the two who voted in committee. Democrats have conditioned floor support on a conflict-of-interest provision covering government officials’ crypto holdings, including the Trump family’s stake in crypto ventures. White House officials have opposed any language that singles out a specific officeholder rather than applying uniformly to all executive branch employees.

The scheduling math runs parallel to the political obstacle. Per the Senate Banking Committee’s summary of the CLARITY Act’s scope and structure, the bill must be reconciled with a separate market-structure measure that cleared the Senate Agriculture Committee before reaching the floor, a process that has not yet begun. About eight weeks remain before the summer recess in early August, a window already competing with FISA reauthorization, the annual defense authorization act, and the farm bill.

  • Senate Banking Committee vote: 15-9 on May 14, two Democrats in support
  • Full Senate threshold: 60 votes required, substantial Democratic participation needed
  • Unresolved: conflict-of-interest provision on government officials’ crypto involvement, negotiations continuing
  • Pending: reconciliation of the Banking Committee bill with the Agriculture Committee’s parallel version before floor scheduling
  • The bank’s probability estimate: approximately 50% chance of passage in 2026, and declining

White House officials had set an Independence Day target for clearing Congress. Several lawmakers have since described end-of-July or early-August as the more realistic window, the final stretch before recess begins.

The Clarity Act’s path to a Senate floor vote still requires a reconciled text, a resolved ethics clause, and a week of floor time it has not yet been allocated.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and prices change rapidly. Figures cited are accurate as of publication. Readers should consult a qualified financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Continue Reading

News

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra Confirmed by Bluetooth SIG

Bluetooth SIG certification confirms the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra name as Samsung prepares two foldable models for its reported July 22 London Unpacked.

Published

on

The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra has cleared Bluetooth SIG certification, the Bluetooth Special Interest Group being the standards body that validates wireless hardware before any public announcement, and the filing formally names a device Samsung has not acknowledged in any press material. Spotted first by Japanese tech site Sumaho Digest and picked up by SamMobile on June 3, 2026, the database entry lists “Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra” alongside five regional model numbers, all filed under the SM-F976 umbrella. The model-number sequence confirms the succession: the Galaxy Z Fold 6 used SM-F956, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 SM-F966, and SM-F976 steps cleanly into the same progression, placing the Fold 8 Ultra as the direct numerical successor to Samsung’s current flagship book-style foldable, with the Ultra badge on a Fold device for the first time.

That certification is the regulatory stamp on a two-device foldable strategy Samsung has been assembling through leaks and supply-chain reports since early 2026. The Fold 8 Ultra steps into the slot the Fold 7 vacated, while a second model, the Galaxy Z Fold 8, arrives in a wider, tablet-proportioned form factor the Fold line has never carried before.

The Filing That Locked In the Name

Bluetooth SIG certification validates a device’s right to use Bluetooth and registers the product name the manufacturer submits. Hardware specifications stay entirely out of it, so the Fold 8 Ultra’s database entry confirms the name and the markets Samsung registered first, nothing more about what the camera does or how thin the hinge goes.

The five variants in the filing all point at Japan:

  • SC-56G for NTT Docomo
  • SCG39 for KDDI/au
  • SM-F976C for Rakuten Mobile
  • SM-F976Q for the SIM-free unlocked version
  • SM-F976Z for SoftBank

Japanese carriers require compliance paperwork earlier than most markets for network integration testing, which is why Samsung’s certification trail consistently begins there. The SC- and SCG- prefix designations identify the NTT Docomo and KDDI-branded models, standard Samsung practice for Japan, while the SIM-free SM-F976Q suggests broad carrier-agnostic availability from launch week.

The five Japanese models span all four of the country’s major carriers plus an unlocked SIM-free configuration. That breadth of carrier registration, covering the full Japanese market in a single certification sweep, has preceded Samsung’s global foldable launches in prior years.

Bluetooth certifications for Samsung foldables have historically appeared four to eight weeks before a public Unpacked reveal. The June 3 timestamp puts the Fold 8 Ultra’s filing at roughly seven weeks ahead of the rumored July 22 Unpacked date, a gap consistent with the Galaxy Z Fold 7’s own regulatory appearances before its 2025 reveal.

Earlier this year, Samsung tipster Ice Universe described the naming call as a late decision, reached only recently before the lineup was finalized. That context, and what drove Samsung to attach the Ultra suffix to a Fold device for the first time, is traced in our earlier coverage of the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra name and Samsung’s crease competition with OPPO. The Bluetooth SIG database now lists SM-F976 as “Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra” under Samsung’s own registered product name, whatever the internal naming timeline was.

Samsung’s Ultra Playbook, Applied to Foldables

The S20 Moment That Set the Template

Samsung attached the Ultra label to a Galaxy phone for the first time in February 2020, when the Galaxy S20 Ultra was unveiled at Unpacked alongside the standard S20 and the S20+. The S20 Ultra was an additive move: it sat above the S20+ at $1,399 for 128GB, $200 above the Plus and $400 above the base S20 at $999. Samsung priced it to match a spec list buyers could name on a comparison page: 108MP main camera, 100x Space Zoom, a 6.9-inch screen, and a 5,000 mAh battery.

Over six generations, the badge built specific associations. The Galaxy S22 Ultra introduced an integrated S Pen slot, which has appeared in every S Ultra since. Each year’s S Ultra also carries the longest telephoto Samsung puts in a non-foldable phone. That reading has been accurate across six S Ultra generations.

A Different Kind of Ultra

The Fold 7’s successor becomes the Fold 8 Ultra, taking the Ultra suffix while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 label migrates to the new wide-format device. In the Galaxy S series, the Ultra was an additive tier placed above the Plus model. Samsung’s Fold version applies the label to the existing flagship slot instead, while the base position goes to a device in a different physical shape.

Category Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020) Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra (2026)
Ultra’s role New tier added above S20+ Renamed existing Fold flagship
Base model at launch Galaxy S20 (same slab form factor) Galaxy Z Fold 8 (new wide form factor)
Camera headline 108MP main, 100x zoom 200MP main, triple rear array
Battery 5,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Estimated US launch price $1,399 ~$1,999 (supply-chain estimate)

Since Samsung released the original Galaxy Fold in 2019, each summer brought a single book-style flagship. Two Fold-format devices at the same event is new territory, creating a form-factor choice between the camera-heavy tall model and the wider, lighter one built for screen area.

Some S Ultra features don’t follow the name to the foldable. Leaked specifications cap wired charging at 45W, against 60W on the Galaxy S26 Ultra. There’s no S Pen slot. The Privacy Display feature, which limits viewing angles for nearby bystanders and has appeared on the S Ultra since the S24 generation, does not appear in the Fold 8 Ultra’s reported spec list.

Camera Arrays and the Width Gap

Both Fold 8 models share the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, the Qualcomm custom chip powering the Galaxy S26 Ultra that arrived earlier this year. Both support 45W wired charging and carry identical front-camera configurations. The split between them is in the rear camera count and the physical format.

Specification Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra Galaxy Z Fold 8 (Wide)
Outer display 6.5 inches Not confirmed
Inner display 8 inches, portrait ratio 7.6 inches, 4:3 ratio
Main camera 200MP, OIS 50MP
Ultrawide 50MP, autofocus 50MP
Telephoto 10MP, 3x optical None
Weight ~210g ~200g
Battery 5,000 mAh 4,800 mAh
Wired charging 45W 45W

The Fold 8 Ultra’s triple rear array is the clearest separating specification. A 200MP main sensor with optical image stabilization, a 50MP ultrawide with autofocus, and a 10MP 3x telephoto give it a more complete rear setup than any Samsung foldable before it. Its 5,000 mAh battery is a significant jump over its predecessor’s 4,400 mAh cell, a capacity that reviewers consistently flagged as inadequate for a phone at that price. At 4.1mm unfolded, it also trims the previous generation’s 4.2mm profile, arriving at around 210 grams against 215 grams before.

The wide model makes different choices. It drops the telephoto and the high-resolution main sensor, arriving with two 50MP cameras and a chassis at around 200 grams. Its 7.6-inch inner screen in a 4:3 aspect ratio is designed for document editing and split-screen productivity in ways a taller, narrower screen makes harder.

SamMobile reported in March that the Fold 8 Ultra’s inner panel uses a dual-UTG (Ultra Thin Glass) structure combined with a laser-drilled metal support plate, aimed at reducing the visible crease when the phone is open. Samsung Display showcased the crease-reducing panel concept at CES 2026. The crease has been a persistent complaint since the first-generation Galaxy Fold, and a point competitors consistently raise against Samsung’s book-style devices. Samsung has not confirmed the final production specification.

The Timing and Its Competition

Apple is widely expected to enter the foldable market later in 2026, potentially under its own Ultra label based on supply-chain and certification reports circulating through the year. Samsung getting the Fold 8 Ultra into Bluetooth SIG months ahead of Apple’s anticipated reveal gives the Galaxy device a search and retail head start: buyers researching foldables ahead of that launch will find a certified, already-shipping option first. Early supply-chain reports have pegged the Fold 8 Ultra’s US starting price at $1,999 for 256GB, matching what Samsung charged for its predecessor’s debut configuration in the US.

China’s foldable brands have also changed the market Samsung is navigating. Huawei brought the wide, passport-proportioned inner display to mass production before Samsung shipped anything comparable in that shape. Xiaomi has moved similarly on thinness and weight targets, its foldable lineup competing closely on specs that once gave Samsung clear separation. The wide-format Galaxy Z Fold 8 answers that design direction. Above it, the Ultra badge on the Fold 8 Ultra holds the premium position as Apple prepares to enter the same market.

A software angle sits alongside the hardware. Leaks cited by multiple outlets report that the Fold 8 series will ship with Google’s Gemini Intelligence, Google’s on-device AI assistant feature, pre-loaded as the default out of the box. The arrangement reportedly covers both Fold models and extends a software partnership Samsung and Google have built across several Galaxy generations. Samsung has not confirmed the feature for the Fold 8 lineup.

Galaxy Unpacked London, July 22

Samsung is expected to hold its annual Galaxy Unpacked foldable launch on July 22 in London, a date first reported by South Korean tech press. It would mark the first summer Unpacked held in the UK capital; previous foldable launch events have gone to Seoul, San Francisco, and New York. Samsung has not confirmed the location or sent invitations as of June 4, 2026.

The Galaxy Z Flip 8 is expected to appear on the same stage, continuing the clamshell foldable line. Codenames for the Galaxy Watch 9 surfaced in a Wear OS app teardown in late May, pointing to a three-tier watch lineup; our Galaxy Watch 9 codename breakdown details what the software evidence suggests for each model. Galaxy Glasses, Samsung’s entry into consumer wearable eyewear, have also appeared in Unpacked speculation for the same date.

Galaxy Unpacked is scheduled for July 22 in London; following Samsung’s standard cadence, pre-orders are expected to open the same day, with units in stores roughly two weeks later.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Game of Thrones: Dragonfire Makes Season 3 Viewing Pay Off

Game of Thrones: Dragonfire launched June 2 free to play, tying each House of the Dragon Season 3 episode you watch on HBO Max to a bespoke in-game reward.

Published

on

Game of Thrones: Dragonfire went live on iOS and Android on June 2, nineteen days before House of the Dragon Season 3 premieres on HBO. Developed by Warner Bros. Games Boston and published alongside HBO as a global free-to-play title, the game casts players as Valyrian descendants building a dragonriding empire across a tile-based Westeros map during the Targaryen civil war, set 172 years before the events of the original Game of Thrones series. The launch roster includes 28 dragons, with more planned through live service updates.

Players who link their HBO Max and WB Games accounts earn a distinct in-game reward for each of the eight Season 3 episodes they watch, plus a premium reward for completing the full run. Warner Bros. Discovery calls the mechanism a “first-of-its-kind technology collaboration” between HBO Max and WB Games.

The Dance of Dragons, Tile by Tile

Building Power Across Westeros

The core loop is a 4X base-building strategy: expand your stronghold, train troops, grow dragons, and capture territory from rivals. Each tile provides distinct benefits, from resources used to upgrade strongholds, train troops and grow dragons, to geographical advantages that allow multiple allies to garrison and provide faster reinforcements to armies. Players can field up to five dragon-led armies simultaneously, allowing for coordinated marches, strategic assaults and defensive maneuvers across a tiled map.

Competitive players can join an Alliance, coordinate multi-army attacks across the tiled map, and contribute to broader Faction-level objectives. Alliance warfare pits groups against each other for control of key territories, with Faction-wide story outcomes tied to collective performance. Solo players can also make meaningful contributions to broader Faction goals without joining an Alliance, ensuring multiple paths to progression. A separate PvE campaign track lets players follow the Targaryen civil war narrative without the coordination demands of multiplayer warfare.

Dragon Breeds and Seasonal Reigns

Warner Bros. Games Boston worked with the House of the Dragon brand team to define four dragon breeds, each built for a different tactical role. The April 7 WB Games announcement introduced the categories alongside the first gameplay footage:

  • Champion Breed – high offensive output, built for front-line assault
  • Hunter Breed – speed-optimized, suited to rapid territorial expansion
  • Sentinel Breed – defensive-focused, designed to hold contested terrain under coordinated attack
  • Warrior Breed – versatile, built for flexible Alliance operations across multiple fronts

Each new dragon was created in close collaboration with the House of the Dragon brand partners, with the show’s iconic dragon breeds informing the various dragon breeds featured within the game. Each dragon features distinct Command skills, passive Habit abilities, troop affinities and powerful synergies that support a variety of strategies and playstyles. The roster includes Syrax, Caraxes, Seasmoke, and more, alongside original designs created specifically for the game. Beyond the battlefield, fans can further engage with their dragons through a Dragon Strike minigame, where players fly their dragons to evade obstacles and unleash fire on incoming enemies.

Game of Thrones: Dragonfire will have eight-week seasons, called Reigns, with special events and quests, making every season completely different than the last. Each Reign resets the territorial map and introduces new storylines, keeping competition accessible for players who join mid-cycle. Permanent progress like dragon growth will remain, allowing for long-term progression. From fighting to secure Rhaenyra Targaryen’s claim to the Iron Throne to infiltrating the Greens and shaping events from within, each Campaign offers a player-driven path into the world fans know and love.

When Watching Earns Progress

The mechanism works through a linked-account system. Connect a WB Games profile to an active HBO Max subscription and each Season 3 episode you watch on the platform unlocks a per-episode reward specific to that episode rather than a generic currency drop. Players who link their accounts can earn escalating Game of Thrones: Dragonfire rewards by watching House of the Dragon Season 3, with each episode unlocking a bespoke in-game reward, plus a premium reward for completing the full season.

The integration goes further than what WB Games Boston previously offered through Game of Thrones: Conquest’s HBO Max account link, which provided one-time general rewards for connecting accounts and, per the game’s own support documentation, was limited to US players. Dragonfire’s system is structured around Season 3’s eight-week broadcast schedule, with rewards escalating across the run rather than a single sign-in bonus.

Three weeks separate the June 2 launch from Season 3’s premiere, giving players time to install, build an initial base, and configure the account link before the first episode triggers on June 21. JB Perrette, CEO and President of Global Streaming and Games at Warner Bros. Discovery, said in the official June 2 launch press release that the goal was an experience “very authentic to ‘House of the Dragon.'” Matt Read, Vice President and Studio Head at Warner Bros. Games Boston, said the studio focused on creating a game “that feels true to the universe fans love while giving them room to play their own way.”

Steve Toussaint, who plays Lord Corlys Velaryon on the show, appears in a launch-day Let’s Play video released alongside the announcement. Cast involvement at this level is unusual for a mobile free-to-play launch. Toussaint is also among the House of the Dragon stars attending the Season 3 world premiere at Italy’s Taormina Film Festival, where the first episode will have an exclusive early premiere at the festival, which runs from June 10 to June 14. That puts him on promotional duty for both the game and the show in the same two-week window.

A Studio That Already Ran This Playbook

Game of Thrones: Dragonfire is made by WB Games Boston, who also developed Game of Thrones Conquest and The Lord of the Rings Online. The studio launched Conquest in October 2017 while the original HBO series was still in production; Conquest remains active today. While there’s already an ongoing mobile Game of Thrones offering in Conquest, Dragonfire promises to work alongside Conquest and isn’t replacing it. WBD’s choice to operate both titles simultaneously positions Conquest for the original series audience while Dragonfire serves the House of the Dragon viewer cohort, timed specifically around Season 3.

Per Sensor Tower’s first-year revenue estimates for Conquest, the game grossed more than $125 million globally in its first year after the October 2017 launch, with a compound monthly growth rate of 14.8 percent. Sensor Tower’s figures are estimates from Store Intelligence data; WBD’s actual internal numbers have not been disclosed publicly. Conquest launched three months after Game of Thrones Season 7 ended, then built steadily through the 18-month gap to Season 8’s April 2019 premiere. Players spent an unprecedented $19 million worldwide in April 2019 across the App Store and Google Play, an increase of 90 percent from the same month in 2018. Last month’s total brought overall spending to date in Game of Thrones: Conquest to more than $214 million worldwide. Conquest has now been live for nine years, the longest active track record of any Game of Thrones mobile title.

Game of Thrones: Conquest Game of Thrones: Dragonfire
Year launched October 2017 June 2, 2026
Show tie-in Game of Thrones (Seasons 1-8) House of the Dragon
Core gameplay 4X castle-building strategy 4X tile-based dragon strategy
Streaming integration Account link (one-time rewards, US only) Per-episode rewards across 8 Season 3 episodes
Status (June 2026) Active since 2017 Global launch

Can the Free-to-Play Model Hold?

Fans of the franchise have been waiting for a proper mobile Game of Thrones strategy game, with past releases such as Game of Thrones: Conquest (2017) and Game of Thrones: Winter Is Coming (2019) feeling a bit too over-reliant on mobile-game monetization features. Both games drew criticism for paid speed-up mechanics that gave spending players measurable advantages in troop and resource development, the standard competitive pressure point for the 4X mobile format. Dragonfire has confirmed in-app purchases; what those specifically cover was not disclosed in the launch materials.

Those who preregistered will receive bonus in-game currency and cosmetics, but there are also rewards for new players. The April 7 pre-registration page offered players exclusive rewards at launch, including in-game currency and a rare dragon. That structure points toward premium dragon rarity as a layer where the spending model will concentrate, consistent with how Conquest operated across its run.

Two structural decisions in Dragonfire push against the most common version of that criticism. The game features a living world where limited-time seasonal Reigns will reset the competition and race for territory control, introducing new storylines while keeping competition balanced for new and returning players. Dragon progress persists through each reset, so development investment carries into the next Reign’s map rather than being zeroed out, giving paid roster development lasting value without locking other players out permanently.

Per Sensor Tower’s spending analysis of Conquest through early 2019, the game averaged nearly $18 in player spending per download over its first two years. Whether Dragonfire’s Reign structure produces a different spending profile from Conquest is a question its first few active cycles will answer.

A Franchise in Every Direction

The third season of House of the Dragon is due to premiere on HBO on June 21, 2026, in the United States, and will consist of eight episodes. The eight-episode season will air new episodes weekly until the season finale on August 9. Showrunner Ryan Condal has described the opening episode, built around the Battle of the Gullet, as “arguably the craziest episode of television ever made.” It’s been confirmed that House of the Dragon Season 4 will end the series in 2028.

Dragonfire launched into a Westeros calendar running several concurrent projects:

  • House of the Dragon Season 3 (HBO and HBO Max, June 21 through August 9): Eight episodes covering the full-scale Dance of the Dragons war, with Season 4 in 2028 as the confirmed finale
  • A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms (HBO Max): the premium cabler is currently prepping Season 2 of the prequel which debuted its critically acclaimed first season earlier this year
  • Beau Willimon (Andor) writing the Aegon’s Conquest theatrical film alongside Mattson Tomlin, covering Aegon Targaryen’s founding conquest of the Seven Kingdoms; Willimon is best known for developing House of Cards
  • Game of Thrones: War for Westeros (mobile): a separate title also in development, still waiting on a release date

On the Google Play Store, Dragonfire has been downloaded over one million times as of this writing. The episode reward triggers go live when House of the Dragon Season 3 premieres on June 21.

Continue Reading

Trending