NEWS
Trump Refuses to Sign Housing Bill, Yet His Own CBDC Ban Becomes Law
Trump refused to sign the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act over the stalled SAVE America Act, but it became law at midnight anyway, CBDC ban included.
The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became federal law at midnight Friday, even though President Donald Trump refused to sign it. His protest targeted the Senate’s failure to pass the SAVE America Act, a voter identification bill he has pushed for months. It changed nothing about the housing law’s fate.
Buried inside that same bill is a policy Trump has wanted for years: a four year ban on a central bank digital currency (CBDC), a Federal Reserve issued digital dollar. It becomes law too, whether he liked the company it kept or not.
A Bill Becomes Law Without a Signature
House Speaker Mike Johnson delivered the legislation, formally H.R. 6644’s full legislative record, to the White House on June 29. Under the Constitution, a president has 10 days, excluding Sundays, to sign or veto a bill before it takes effect on its own, so long as Congress stays in session.
Trump let that clock run out. On Friday morning, hours before the deadline, he wrote on Truth Social, “I will not sign the Housing Bill, which has been fully approved by Congress and sent to the White House, in PROTEST over the fact that the United States Senate is not capable of passing THE SAVE AMERICA ACT.” He added, “THE SAVE AMERICA ACT’S non-passage is CRAZY, and a serious threat to any politician who votes against it!”
Senate Banking Chairman Tim Scott, a South Carolina Republican who co-wrote the bill, had announced weeks earlier that his committee sent the bill to Trump’s desk. The measure passed with margins far beyond a veto override anyway, 358-32 in the House and 85-5 in the Senate. A White House official confirmed Trump would not veto it either, clearing the way for automatic enactment.
Why Didn’t Trump Just Veto It?
Because a veto would have failed anyway. Congress passed the bill with margins far beyond the two-thirds needed to override a presidential veto, so a formal rejection would have only confirmed how isolated Trump had become within his own party. Letting the clock expire let him protest without killing a law his own administration had praised weeks earlier.
Johnson had pressed Trump to sign anyway, telling him to grab “the fattest black marker you have” for the signature. “If he doesn’t, it’s still law; we’ll still celebrate it,” Johnson said. “But he’s trying to make a point and I think he’s making it very effectively.”
Trump had already previewed his thinking weeks earlier, telling reporters, “I made billions of dollars with housing. I know housing better than anybody maybe anywhere. It’s all about the interest rate. Lower the interest rates, you can have all the housing you want.” He had called the bill “a big yawn” and “of minor importance” before abruptly canceling a signing ceremony in June.
Donald Trump cares so little about bringing down YOUR housing costs that he’s refusing to sign the biggest housing bill in 30 years.
Senate Banking Committee ranking member Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat who helped write the bill, posted that on X Friday morning. She added that the bill would become law anyway, calling that the good news.
The SAVE America Act Is Still Stuck at 53
The SAVE America Act, formally the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, would require proof of citizenship to register for federal elections and a valid photo ID to cast a ballot. It needs 60 votes to clear the Senate filibuster. Republicans hold only 53 of 100 seats, and a narrower photo ID amendment already failed there in March on a 53-47 vote.
Trump has repeatedly demanded Senate Republicans scrap the filibuster to force it through. Majority Leader John Thune has said the votes for that simply are not there. Polling shows the underlying photo ID idea is broadly popular, with a Pew Research Center survey finding 83% of adults favor requiring government issued identification to vote. But voter groups warn the specific bill goes further than that.
The Brennan Center for Justice, a nonpartisan law and policy institute, says the bill’s ID list is more restrictive than every state’s voter ID law but Ohio’s, since it excludes student identification. Axios has reported the center estimates more than 21 million Americans lack easy access to the documents the bill would require. Voters without an ID would not be turned away outright. They could cast a provisional ballot and prove ID within three days, according to FactCheck.org, a nonpartisan fact checking project.
| Measure | 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act | SAVE America Act |
|---|---|---|
| House vote | 358-32 | Passed Feb. 11, no matching Senate vote yet |
| Senate vote | 85-5 on June 22 | Photo ID amendment failed 53-47 in March |
| Status as of July 11 | Law, effective automatically | Stalled short of 60 votes |
| Core requirement | Caps corporate home buying, freezes Fed CBDC push | Photo ID and citizenship proof to vote |
Trump has claimed the SAVE America Act polls at 97% among Republicans. Independent surveys tell a messier story. A Navigator Research poll in March found 50% of voters initially backed the bill, but support fell to 45% once respondents heard messaging against it.
Stablecoins Are the Quiet Winners of a Housing Fight
The CBDC section bars the Federal Reserve from issuing or creating a digital dollar, or anything substantially similar, through the end of 2030. That leaves the field clear for private, dollar pegged tokens instead, an outcome that lines up with Trump’s January 2025 executive order already opposing a government run digital currency.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called the GENIUS Act, the 2025 law that first regulated private stablecoins, “a seminal moment for digital assets and dollar supremacy” when Trump signed it. Read together, the two laws draw a clear line: private tokens are welcome, a Fed competitor is not. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, who has pushed anti-CBDC bills for years, has long argued a Fed digital dollar would threaten financial privacy.
- $308 billion – size of the stablecoin market that Tether and Circle dominate, according to CoinGecko data.
- 84% – the combined share of that market held by Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC.
- Four years – how long the new law bars the Fed from launching a rival digital dollar.
- January 2025 – when Trump’s own executive order first tried to block a CBDC, before Congress made it statute.
The fight over who controls the Fed has flared elsewhere too. Earlier this year the Supreme Court blocked his attempt to remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook, a separate setback in the administration’s broader push to reshape the central bank.
What the New Law Actually Changes
Beyond the crypto language, the law’s stated purpose is boosting home supply. White House economists have pegged the national shortage at roughly 10 million homes. Large institutional investors currently own only about 3% of single-family rentals nationally, though their footprint is far larger in specific cities and neighborhoods.
- Corporate landlord cap – any institutional investor that already owns 350 or more single-family homes cannot buy more.
- Manufactured housing – drops the requirement for a permanent steel chassis, a change expected to save $5,000 to $10,000 per home.
- Pattern books – funds a grant program for preapproved home designs that need fewer local approvals.
- Disaster recovery grants – the Bipartisan Policy Center’s review of the final text notes it authorizes a three year disaster recovery grant extension for the Community Development Block Grant program.
The law does not add new federal housing funding. Instead it redirects existing money toward communities that build more, and it does not require anyone to reregister to vote, since that provision belongs to the separate elections fight entirely.
A Bigger Crypto Bill Is Still Coming
The CBDC ban is not the industry’s last word in Congress this year. The CLARITY Act, a broader bill setting market structure rules for exchanges and token issuers, is pressing toward an August 7 deadline for the CLARITY Act on the Senate floor. One source of friction has already eased, after county sheriffs dropped their opposition to its DeFi provision.
Warren herself sits at the center of both tracks. She is among the Democrats pushing for hearings into Trump’s personal crypto holdings even as she works with Republicans to move the CLARITY Act forward, a split screen that will keep running long after this week’s housing fight fades.
Frequently Asked Questions
How Can a Bill Become Law Without the President’s Signature?
The Constitution gives a president 10 days, excluding Sundays, to sign or veto a bill after Congress delivers it. If the president does neither and Congress stays in session, the bill becomes law automatically, exactly what happened here at midnight on July 11. Had Congress adjourned during that window instead, the bill could have died through a pocket veto rather than becoming law.
What Does the SAVE America Act Actually Require?
It would require proof of citizenship, such as a passport or birth certificate, to register to vote in federal elections, and a valid photo ID such as a driver’s license, passport, or military or tribal card to cast a ballot. Student IDs do not qualify. Mail voters would have to submit copies of their identification with both their ballot request and their completed ballot.
Is the New Ban on a Digital Dollar Permanent?
No. The law bars the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency only through the end of 2030. Some House conservatives in the Freedom Caucus pushed for a permanent ban, but a four year sunset was the compromise that got the bill through both chambers. Congress would have to act again to extend or make it permanent.
How Is the CLARITY Act Different From the CBDC Ban?
The CBDC ban only stops the Federal Reserve from issuing its own digital dollar. The CLARITY Act is a separate, broader bill setting market structure rules for the wider crypto industry, including exchanges and token issuers, and it is still moving through the Senate on its own timeline.
Did the Final Housing Law Include Everything Trump Wanted?
Mostly, but not entirely. House Republicans stripped out a Senate provision that would have forced build-to-rent developers to sell off those homes after seven years, a change Trump himself had objected to earlier this year. Everything else he publicly demanded, the corporate landlord cap and the CBDC freeze, survived into the final text.
-
FINANCE3 months agoZcash Patched a Double-Spend Bug as ZEC Climbed 5%
-
ENTERTAINMENT3 months agoSteam Summer Sale 2026 Locks In June 25 to July 9 Dates
-
FINANCE2 months agoCLARITY Act Final Text Expected This Weekend as 60-Vote Hurdle Looms
-
NEWS3 months agoMeta Adds AI Replies to Threads, But Users Can’t Block It
-
NEWS3 months agoYouTube Shorts is testing a heart in place of the thumbs-up
-
NEWS3 weeks agoSenators Force Apple Off Chinese Memory as Big Three Cash In
-
NEWS2 months agoNEURA Robotics’ $1.4B Series C Redraws Europe’s Physical AI Bet
-
FINANCE2 months agoKalshi Loses Major NY Prediction Markets Ruling to Judge Torres
